Nonpayment of Rent
Tenant stops paying rent, claiming landlord
wouldn't fix air conditioner
Westwood Group Partnership v. Moore, Court of Appeals of Tennessee,
Eastern Section, at Knoxville, No. 03AOI-9805-CV-00155 (1998)

Question before the court:
Was tenant justified in
withholding rent because of inadequate air-conditioning?
Facts of the case:
Moore leased office space for his
medical practice from Westwood Group Partnership in January 1995. The lease called for
monthly rent of $800, which could increase by up to 6 percent each year. The lease also
provided that in the event of litigation the prevailing party was entitled to all costs,
including reasonable attorneys' fees. In 1996 the rent increased to $848, which Moore
paid. In 1997 the rent increased to $898. According to the landlord, Moore paid only $848
rent in January and February 1987, and paid the additional $100 due for those two months
only after the landlord demanded payment. Moore paid $848 rent in March, April, and May of
1997, and stopped paying rent completely in June.
In early June 1997, Moore sent the landlord a letter
stating he refused to pay the rent because the landlord wouldn't repair the air
conditioner. The landlord sent Moore a termination letter giving him 60 days to move out,
based on his continued refusal to pay rent. Moore moved out in September 1997.
The landlord sued Moore for breaching the lease, seeking
unpaid rent, late fees, and attorneys' fees.
At trial, Moore argued he was justified in not paying
the rent because the landlord refused to repair the air conditioner, leaving the office
unbearably hot. He claimed the unit was never able to cool the office, which he said
threatened some of his patients' health. Moore said he called a repair service several
times to have the system repaired and paid the bill himself. His employee testified the
office was very hot and she had called the repair service several times. She didn't say
the landlord had ever refused to have the air conditioner fixed.
The landlord's manager said Moore had complained several
times about the air conditioning, and that each time she or her husband fixed the unit or
had a repair service come immediately. She said the problem was usually a clogged filter,
and the unit worked fine once the filter was cleaned. Another tenant in the building
testified that she was in Moore's clinic frequently and had never noticed it being
uncomfortably warm. The other tenant said she had never heard anyone complain about the
beat, and said her own system worked fine.
The repair service's owner testified that he worked on
the air conditioner about three times, once for a dirty filter and twice for other power
problems. He said the unit was more than adequate to cool the office space, but also said
Moore's employee told him she sometimes turned the air conditioner off at night and turned
it back on during the day. According to the repair service's owner, this could overwork
the system. Finally, the owner said the landlord, not Moore, had paid all of his bills.
Trial court finds for landlord
The court found Moore breached the
lease. It ordered him to pay rent, late fees, and attorneys' fees totally almost $5,400.
Tenant appealed.
DECISION: Affirmed.
The trial court properly ordered
Moore to pay rent, late fees, and attorneys' fees.
Although Moore claimed the landlord's refusal to repair
his space's air conditioner justified his not paying the rent, there was more than enough
evidence to justify the trial court's finding that Moore breached the lease by failing to
pay the rent. Though Moore testified to the contrary, the court reasonably found the
landlord promptly had the air conditioner repaired at its own expense each time there was
a problem. The repairman said he had fixed the unit at least three times, always at the
landlord's expense. Another tenant in the building said she was frequently in Moore's
office and never noticed it was too hot.
The landlord also successfully argued on appeal that it
was entitled to additional attorneys' fees because Moore's appeal was frivolous. The court
agreed, and ordered the trial court to determine and award the landlord its reasonable
costs associated with defending Moore's appeal.

Also see: Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Taylor, 590 S. W2d 920 (1977).
|