RHOL.COM
Rental Housing On Line
The Internet's comprehensive rental property location
 

Landlord quotes different rental rates based on race

Fair Housing Partnership, Inc. (FHP) sues for discrimination

The Fair Housing Act, also known as the Civil Rights Act of 1968, prohibits persons involved in residential real estate-related transactions from discriminating against a person on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, handicap or familial status. The Act among other things makes it illegal to discriminate against any protected class when selling or renting a dwelling.

PENNSYLVANIA August 14, 2001

Question Before the Court: when a landlord quotes different rent rates to different tenant applicants is it violation of the Fair Housing Act?

Facts: The DeFelices purchased property next door to their home intending to put it on the market for rent. The Fishers, a black couple, contacted the DeFelices about renting the apartment. The Fishers were shown the property, given a rental application and quoted a rental price of $850 per month.

The Fishers were not happy with the way the DeFelices treated them during the visit. They felt the DeFelices did not want them as neighbors and were discriminating against them because of race. Instead of submitting the rental application, the Fishers contacted the Fair Housing Partnership Inc. (FHP) to complain.

FHP sent two testers, one black, the other white, to make inquiries about the rental property. The black tester was quoted a price of $950 a month, while the white tester was quoted $700 per month.

Based on FHP's investigation, the Fishers sued the DeFelices, alleging unlawful discrimination based on race.

The DeFelices asserted that neither the Fishers nor the FHP testers were determined to be qualified to rent the property, and thus were never denied the opportunity to rent it. Therefore, they couldn't have discriminated against the Fishers.

DECISION: for the plaintiff. The court ruled in favor of the Fisher's discrimination claim. Damages and attorneys' fees were awarded.

APPEALED: The DeFelices appealed.

DECISION: Affirmed. The DeFelices racially discriminated against the Fishers.

To prove discrimination based upon race, rental applicants must show they were a member of a protected class and were not offered the same terms, conditions, or privileges for the rental of a dwelling.

The Fishers were black and thus members of a protected class. The Fishers and the black FHP tester were quoted substantially higher rents than the white tester. Therefore, the dispari­ty between the quotations established the DeFelices' racial discrimination.

Because the DeFelices were unable to provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for their actions, damages and attorneys' fees were correctly awarded.

Citation: Fisher v. DeFelice, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, No. 1945 C.D. 2000 (2001).